Public Notice - Notice of Decision Proposed Update to the Existing Well 13 Facility (File No. CUP25-1002)

Notice of Decision
Conditional Use Permit for Proposed Updates to the Existing Well 13 Facility
Planning Case: CUP25-1002
Consolidated File: Shoreline Conditional Use Permit, Archeological Review, Critical Area Review, Sepa Review, and Minor Design Review    

THIS IS TO SERVE AS NOTICE that a decision of APPROVAL for Planning Case CUP25-1002 has been rendered for a proposal for a Conditional Use Permit for updates to existing Well 13, including but not limited to, installing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) treatment equipment, adding a generator, addition to electrical room, building addition for chemical/well room for a proposed new well, and constructing a driveway off East 1st Avenue. 

The final order and the application materials are available upon request to the City.  See City Contact information above.

RECONSIDERATION (Refer to CMC 18.55.235):

Any party of record believing that a decision of the hearings examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the public hearing, may make a written request to the examiner, filed with the city clerk (Municipal Center, 616 NE 4^th Ave., Camas), to be accompanied by an appeal fee of $1,500 for reconsideration by the examiner.

1. Time Frame. The request for reconsideration shall be filed within fourteen calendar days of the date the decision was rendered. Deadline for filing a reconsideration request is June 30, 2025, at 5:00 p.m.
2. Content. The request for reconsideration shall contain the following:
   1. The case number designated by the city and the name of the applicant;
   2. The name and signature of each petitioner;
   3. The specific aspect(s) of the decision being appealed, the reasons why each aspect is in error as a matter of fact or law and the evidence relied on to prove the error. If the petitioner wants to introduce new evidence in support of the appeal, the written appeal must explain why such evidence should be considered.
3. The hearings examiner may, after review of the materials submitted in conjunction with the reconsideration request, and review of the open record hearing transcript, take further action as he or she deems proper; including, but not limited to, denying the request, modifying the decision, or affirming the decision.
4. The hearings examiner shall issue a decision on a request for reconsideration within forty-five (45) days of the filing of the request for reconsideration. When a request for a reconsideration has been timely filed, any appeal to Clark County Superior Court under the Land Use Petition Act shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days after a hearing examiner issues its decision on the request for reconsideration.

JUDICIAL APPEALS (Refer to RCW Chapter 36.70C):

The City’s final decision on an application may be appealed by a party of record withstanding to file to land use petition in Clark County superior court. Such petition must be filed as provided in Chapter 36.70C RCW.